Since early 2025, the Trump administration has taken bold steps to cut billions of dollars in federal funding from elite universities. These actions have drawn both praise and protest, but the truth is clear: the government has every right to hold wealthy institutions accountable, especially when those institutions have failed students, misused public funds, and allowed discrimination to fester on campus.
In April, the Department of Education froze over $2.2 billion in research grants and contracts meant for Harvard alone. A second round of cuts followed in May, removing another $450 million. Altogether, the federal government has stripped Harvard of about $2.65 billion—marking one of the largest funding losses for a single university in American history. Democrats may call these moves extreme, but many taxpayers would argue they are long overdue.
Elite universities like Harvard and Columbia claim to support free speech, equality, and intellectual diversity. Yet over the past several years, these same schools have failed to protect Jewish students from harassment, ignored rising antisemitism, and punished students for speaking views outside the mainstream. A 2024 survey by the Anti-Defamation League found that nearly 73 percent of Jewish college students reported experiencing or witnessing antisemitism on campus. Administrators have often turned a blind eye or even encouraged biased behavior in the name of “activism.”
Meanwhile, these institutions have grown rich and bloated. Harvard’s endowment alone stands at nearly $51 billion. Columbia and Princeton also control multi-billion dollar endowments, with more than enough cash to fund research and student aid without relying on taxpayer dollars. Yet these schools have continued to collect public money while paying top administrators seven-figure salaries, expanding DEI (diversity, equity, and inclusion) offices, and funneling funds into politically charged programs. In 2023, Harvard spent more than $23 million on DEI efforts, while cutting budgets in departments like math and engineering.
The government has a responsibility to make sure taxpayer dollars are not used to support discrimination, censorship, or corruption. That principle applies to any institution, whether a business, a nonprofit, or a university. Just because a school has prestige does not mean it deserves endless public money without oversight.
Some Democrats say that pulling funds from universities harms research and innovation. But the numbers tell a different story. Less than 15 percent of all federal research funding goes to Ivy League schools. Most scientific progress in the United States still comes from public universities, private companies, and government labs—not just from elite campuses. Cutting unnecessary funding to a few wealthy institutions will not destroy American science. Instead, it will encourage smarter spending and greater fairness in how resources are shared.
Trump’s decision to also defund NPR and PBS shows that this campaign is not just about universities—it is about cleaning up a larger problem. For too long, nonprofit institutions that depend on public money have acted like private political organizations. These groups should either stay neutral or give up federal funds. The government does not owe elite institutions a blank check.
Harvard’s lawsuit against the Department of Education argues that the funding cuts violate free speech and academic freedom. But freedom does not mean immunity. A university can still speak freely, but no one has a right to demand billions of dollars from taxpayers while ignoring basic standards of fairness, safety, and accountability.
While Harvard scrambles to sell bonds and tap into its massive endowment, other universities are starting to feel the pressure. Columbia reported a $380 million loss in federal grants. Princeton canceled construction projects and froze hiring. Financial experts say that many elite schools are now facing a serious cash crunch—and that may be a good thing. These schools have grown too comfortable for too long.
Elite institutions were never meant to become unchallengeable empires. The purpose of federal support is to benefit the nation—not to protect the pride of a few privileged schools. If a university wants public money, it should prove it can handle that responsibility with fairness, transparency, and respect for all students.
In the end, this is not just a fight about Harvard or Trump. This is a test of whether the federal government will keep giving billions to powerful institutions that refuse to change. It is a chance to stand up for students, protect free thought, and make sure taxpayer dollars are used wisely. Cutting off the money may be the only way to make these schools listen.
Editor’s Note: To celebrate the passage of the tremendous One Big, Beautiful Bill, we’re offering a fire sale on VIP memberships!
Join us in the fight against the radical left today and support our reporting as President Trump continues to usher in the Golden Age of America. Use promo code POTUS47 at checkout to get 74% off!
Join the conversation as a VIP Member